[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-debug-dev] Patch to improve error messages
|
At 12:28 PM 3/31/2008, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi John,
excuse my ignorance, but are you a committer?
I am.
> Can you explain how to reproduce the problem. If
> I remove the executable of a simple project
> before launching a debug session, I get an error
> dialog that needs improved grammar, but isn't
> completely nonsensical or cryptic (see attached
> screenshot). I assume your scenario is different.
> It's important to provide reproducibility steps
> when you submit a patch (if possible; sometimes,
> a bug can be seen with a particular backend but
> not the standard gnu/cygwin ones.
Are you in agreement that, fundamentally, error messages
should be propagated and not anonymized?
I am.
> And of course, the formal process is to create a bugzilla report.
I've tried that for lots of patches through the years. I'm trying something
a bit different this time to see if I have any better luck. It's an experiment
if you will.
I'm not sure you're going to have much success
since ultimately someone should be opening a
bugzilla report. All you're doing is making more work for committers
Interestingly, you didn't supply the key piece of
information I requested. Reproducibility steps.
John