[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-debug-dev] contents of a binary object in the CDT views
|
Nope; not what I meant.
The modules view provides extra information; I'm not looking to carry
that over. I'm just talking about extending the criteria of what
shows up in the list to cover assembler labels, which many assembler
develops treat as functions.
John
At 02:57 PM 3/23/2007, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Did you mean make the CView look like the modules view with the extra type
information? I'd say yes. I find the symbols in binaries barely useful right
now.
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-debug-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:52 PM
> To: CDT Debug developers list
> Subject: [cdt-debug-dev] contents of a binary object in the CDT views
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-debug-dev mailing list
> cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev