[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: AW: [dsdp-dd-dev] RE: [cdt-debug-dev] JTAG (was: The fate of thecurrent GDB suppor t in CDT)
|
That's the approach we're taking in our initial product, too--use the
launch configuration to house target/connection information. However,
it becomes limiting pretty quickly. Imagine the user having ten
projects that he uses with a single target device. He makes a target
related change (which is fairly common) and is now faced with
changing ten launch configurations. You throw in multi-core, and the
situation is even more complex and fragile. That's why RSE is
attractive to use. In some ways, it will be overkill for even our
intended use, but in this case we think more is better than less.
John
At 10:51 AM 9/1/2006, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I'm just concerned that RSE would be overkill for what I'm trying to
accomplish. From what I can see so far, a simple launch config with an
extensiblity mechanism to configure startup commands for gdb would be
enough. But then I'm a keep it simple kind of guy :).
Doug Schaefer
QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Cortell
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 11:16 AM
To: CDT Debug developers list; CDT Debug developers list
Subject: Re: AW: [dsdp-dd-dev] RE: [cdt-debug-dev] JTAG (was: The fate of
thecurrent GDB suppor t in CDT)
We hope that RSE (Remote System Explorer) will eventually fill that
role, and have already started some prototyping towards that end. We
hope to be active participants in its development starting in a month
or two. I believe others in the dsdp group are looking at RSE in the same
way.
John
At 10:11 AM 9/1/2006, Ploett, Norbert wrote:
>Daniel / Doug,
>
> > Just like in CDT, or in Eclipse as a whole, it's important to think
> > about the correct abstraction layer for any task. We ship a set of
>
>this reminds me of the discussions I read on the DSDP TM list about
>board description standards and such stuff. I have not followed this
>very closely, but isn't this the mission of DSDP TM, to provide
>abstractions for all sorts of target systems, including JTAG probe
>controlled boards?
>
>Just another thought
>
>
>Norbert
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-debug-dev mailing list
>cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
