[buckminster-dev] Re: New version of Buckminster Book available (rev 0.5

[Henrik Lindberg <henrik.lindberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The text is now changed to read:

"As an example, if you want an attribute in component-C to include the 
artifacts ‘g’, and ‘h’, you can declare the attribute’s base to be an 
empty string (base=""), and use the paths ‘plugins/g’,
and ‘plugins/h’. You get the same result if you instead set the base 
like this: base="plugins", and set the paths to just ‘g’ and ‘h’. Does 
it matter which you use? The same files are referenced in both cases. 
The answer is: yes, it matters when you are copying the result. Let’s 
say you copy the result to a location ‘Z’. In the first case you would 
get ‘Z/plugins/g’ and ‘Z/plugins/h’, and in the second case you would 
get ‘Z/g’, and ‘Z/h’."

I hope that is clearer.
- henrik

Henrik Lindberg wrote:
> Hi, no, not a typo, but some commas would make it easier to read. I will 
> rephrase it.
> - henrik
>
> Tas Frangoullides wrote:
> > First line on page 69 is hard to follow. Might be a typo.
> >
> > Tas
> >
> > "Henrik Lindberg" <henrik.lindberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message 
> > news:h4o8q9$ria$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > New Draft of Buckminster Book is available at http://tinyurl.com/ncv4lq
> > >
> > > This is version 0.5 of the book, and it is now getting near 
> > > completion. I (think) have one or two more examples to write, and 
> > > then final editing and polish.
> > >
> > > Your feedback is much appreciated.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > - henrik