Re: [bpel-dev] partnerLinks

[James Moody <James_Moody@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree completely Michal. Yes, this
was a simplification in the IBM codebase from our previous product . The
open source editor should be more faithful to the specification, and behave
as you describe below.

james


bpel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 07/14/2006 01:44:21
PM:

> Have been doing some work on partner links and the following has come
up.
> 
> The code has a notion of reference and interface partners. I think
> this was a simplification that you guys originally did to make 
> everything 1-way or interface like.
> 
> In BPEL, a partnerLinkType can have 1 or 2 roles defined and hence
a
> partner link can have 1 or 2 roles set (myRole and partnerRole).
> 
> To enable this straight BPEL notation, partnerLinks would have to
be
> created without roles initially, and then roles could be set based
> on the partner link type (which allows for 1 or 2 roles). To do 
> that, that interface, reference partners concept would have to collapse.
> 
> And eventually, the WSDL editor will be extended to do the 
> partnerLink editing.
> -- 
> Michal Chmielewski, CMST, Oracle Corp, 
> W:650-506-5952 / M:408-209-9321 
> 
> "Manuals ?! What manuals ? Son, it's Unix, you just gotta know."
> _______________________________________________
> bpel-dev mailing list
> bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/bpel-dev