Re: [atf-dev] XULRunner / ATF Update site

["Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I would have raised this issue on the call yesterday but unfortunately I  
could not make it because of another conflicting call.

Any chance that we could get some feedback/info on how you see others  
should be using the XULRunner in an updatesite to be
as compatible as possible with ATF ?

/max

> Hey everyone..
>
> Recently I was looking over ATF's update site format to get a clue for  
> how dependency on Mozilla's XPCOM and XULRunner plugins was handled. I  
> found that the main ATF feature itself does depend on org.mozilla.xpcom,  
> but not any of the XULRunner features/plugins. I also ran into another  
> interesting problem. XULRunner has been bundled as a seperate feature  
> for each platform implementation, and the plugins themselves live at a  
> different URL than the features that I found.
>
> The 3 platform-dependent XULRunner plugins live at the following URL:
> -  
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/
>
> And the 3 platform-dependent XULRunner features live at the following  
> URL:
> - http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/eclipse/features/
> But the plugins listed at the corresponding "plugins" dir are outdated!
> - http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/eclipse/plugins/
>
> I have a few questions since this was rather confusing..
>
> 1) Why are the URLs for feature JARs and plugins so radically different?  
> Shouldn't the features / plugins dirs be in sync with each other?
> 2) Why is XULRunner packaged as 3 seperate features? This becomes hell  
> for dependency management purposes. It was easier for me to just write  
> one simple feature and put platform/OS conditions on each XULRunner  
> plugin. You can find my feature.xml here:
> -  
> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/vpe/features/org.jboss.tools.xulrunner.feature/feature.xml
> 3) Why isn't ATF depending on XULRunner feature/plugins like it is with  
> XPCOM? With the feature linked above we were able to have our feature  
> depend on it, and use external plugin/feature jar linking (ala the  
> current ATF update site) to have Eclipse auto-check XULRunner when the  
> user presses "Select Required"
>
> Just hoping to get some clarity on how ATF depends on XULRunner and  
> how/if we can reuse that knowledge for our project =).
> Thanks!



--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
max@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://hibernate.org

JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen@xxxxxxxxx