Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ Future
Sorry for asking a slightly off-topic question back to yours, but how does the question relate to the subject "AspectJ future"?
-- 
Alexander Kriegisch


Am 12.09.2017 um 23:23 schrieb Mikael Petterson <mikaelpetterson@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi,


I have done some reading about AOP and it's implementation in java, aspectj.

I decided to give it a try for our application so I downloaded it for Eclipse Neon 4.6.3 that I am using as IDE.


I added an aspect but had to go back to using the "original syntax" and not annotation based since the ajdt did not support it.


I checked the version I downloaded what was available for 4.6 however I can see that the following is not working.


- Space to find context alternatives for annotations.


Is there some setting I have to fix?


br,


//mike


 

 

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Back to the top