[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] ajc 1.6.6 -> 1.6.7+ behavior changes ?
|
Romain,
I was just curious, it is not necessary to dig deeper. It was just an idea, I did not expect it to work anyway. Compilation errors exist for a reason. ;-)
--
Alexander Kriegisch
http://scrum-master.de
Romain Primet schrieb am 11.04.2015 15:03:
> Le 11/04/2015 14:47, Alexander Kriegisch a écrit :
>> Sounds good, Romain, I had no idea Andy was in touch with you.
>>
>> BTW, I noticed that if you add
>> <proceedOnError>true</proceedOnError>
>> to the POM of zvtm-cluster, the build continues and the necessary methods seem
>> to be there in the resulting class files. Can you please test that with the
>> official v1.8.5 (not the fixed preview) and tell me if the software actually
>> does what it is supposed to? I have no idea how to test that because I do not
>> know ZVTM. I am just curious if this workaround to keep the build going
>> actually works or leaves behind inconsistently woven class files.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
> Just tried the official 1.8.5 with the proceedOnError flag; this results
> in a non-functional build on my machine (whereas the snapshot aspectj
> produces a functional build). I'm not sure why though, I'd have to dig
> further.
