Re: [aspectj-users] Is it a bug in the declare parents involving interfa

[Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>]

You need a bugzilla account, which I think you can create on here:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/

Andy


On 4 September 2012 11:15, Henrique Rebêlo <hemr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
>> I have other users asking for static ITDs on interfaces too - there is
>> a placeholder bug:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369261 - if you want to
>> add your use cases to that, it would help shape the feature.
>
>
> Thanks! In order to vote on a feature or raise a bug, a login and password
> is required... Where Should I create one? The one related to the
> aspectj-users is the one to be used there?
>
> Henrique
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have other users asking for static ITDs on interfaces too - there is
>> a placeholder bug:
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369261 - if you want to
>> add your use cases to that, it would help shape the feature.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 4 September 2012 10:03, Henrique Rebêlo <hemr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi Andy,
>> >
>> >> The fact that it works when you comment out the decp and directly add
>> >> 'I extends I2' indicates it is an AspectJ bug.  Please raise it at:
>> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> >> I can imagine this is broken as it isn't a very common pattern that I
>> >> see.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes. Indeed, this is one (tricky) way I figured out to add a static
>> > field in
>> > an interface. Do you have other suggestions that can work better? The
>> > hope
>> > is that in future ITD of static methods and fields work in interfaces.
>> > Anyway, I'll raise the bug...
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > Henrique
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The fact that it works when you comment out the decp and directly add
>> >> 'I extends I2' indicates it is an AspectJ bug.  Please raise it at:
>> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ
>> >>
>> >> I can imagine this is broken as it isn't a very common pattern that I
>> >> see.
>> >>
>> >> cheers,
>> >> Andy
>> >>
>> >> On 31 August 2012 14:51, Henrique Rebêlo <hemr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > Consider the following code:
>> >> >
>> >> > public interface I {}
>> >> >
>> >> > public interface I2 {
>> >> >   public class InnerClass{
>> >> >    public static int i;
>> >> >   }
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > public aspect A {
>> >> >
>> >> >   declare parents: I extends I2;
>> >> >
>> >> >   before(): execution(* I+.(..)){
>> >> >     boolean b = I.InnerClass.i >= 0;
>> >> >   }
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > This code does not compile when I use the declare parents. It does
>> >> > not
>> >> > recognize the inherited inner class. So, it complains when trying to
>> >> > access
>> >> > the static field i. If I comment the declare parents line, and
>> >> > explicitly
>> >> > make the interface I to extend the Interface I2, the code compiles.
>> >> > Is
>> >> > there
>> >> > something wrong? or Is it a compiler's bug related to the declare
>> >> > parents?
>> >> >
>> >> > cheers,
>> >> > Henrique
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ...............................................................................................................................
>> >> > Henrique Rebelo
>> >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr
>> >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > aspectj-users mailing list
>> >> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> aspectj-users mailing list
>> >> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > ...............................................................................................................................
>> > Henrique Rebelo
>> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr
>> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > aspectj-users mailing list
>> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> ...............................................................................................................................
> Henrique Rebelo
> http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr
> Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>