Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?

From: Mark <mark.kharitonov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes, your "trivial" example is it. 

So, what you are saying is that such a backdoor existed before, but no
longer does. I still think it is useful,  regardless of Spring (we are not
using it).

Thanks.

--
View this message in context: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/AspectJ-vs-PostSharp-tp4196604p4197283.html
Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

References:
- [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?
  - From: Mark
- Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?
  - From: Andy Clement
- Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?
  - From: Mark
- Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?
  - From: Andy Clement

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] Why annotations are not exposed through JoinPoint.StaticPart?
Next by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] Why would one ever want to use Load Time Weaving?
Previous by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ vs PostSharp?
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] Why annotations are not exposed through JoinPoint.StaticPart?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs