Re: [aspectj-users] 'checkcast' bytecode instruction following around()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] 'checkcast' bytecode instruction following around() insertion

From: Chuck Ritola <cjritola@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:16:52 -0500
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> There isn't an option to do it, but you could patch the weaver to
> experiment out.
> Probably need to look in
> BcelShadow.weaveAroundInline/weaveAroundClosure where they call
> createConversion.

Thanks for the replying; I'll look into that.

> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

References:
- [aspectj-users] 'checkcast' bytecode instruction following around() insertion
  - From: Chuck Ritola
- Re: [aspectj-users] 'checkcast' bytecode instruction following around() insertion
  - From: Andy Clement

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] How to deduce the method owning the catch statement referred by the handler join point?
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] Call for Demonstrations at AOSD 2012
Previous by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] 'checkcast' bytecode instruction following around() insertion
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] How AspectJ reflection engine compares against the standard Java one performance wise?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs