[aspectj-users] How AspectJ reflection engine compares against the stand

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[aspectj-users] How AspectJ reflection engine compares against the standard Java one performance wise?

From: Mark <mark.kharitonov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In other words, if I am writing plain old Java reflection code, should I
consider rewriting it using the AspectJ reflection system instead, because
the latter is faster?

--
View this message in context: http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/How-AspectJ-reflection-engine-compares-against-the-standard-Java-one-performance-wise-tp4174240p4174240.html
Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [aspectj-users] How AspectJ reflection engine compares against the standard Java one performance wise?
  - From: Andy Clement

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT error
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] My declare warning pointcut generates too many duplicate warnings, how to fix it?
Previous by thread: [aspectj-users] 'checkcast' bytecode instruction following around() insertion
Next by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] How AspectJ reflection engine compares against the standard Java one performance wise?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs