Re: [aspectj-users] policy enforcement for parameterless constructor and

[Kristof Jozsa <kristof.jozsa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm I wasn't yet aware of this hasmember feature. I tried to google
around and also checked my copy of Aspectj in Action but could not
find much examples.

Are there any usage details on hasfield/hasmethod somewhere? Also, is
there a unit test suite which I could check for examples? The AspectJ
source download doesn't seem to include any tests..

thanks,
K


On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Adams <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the first one, you might try using "declare error" with a type
> pattern that uses hasmember.  Not sure what you mean by the second,
> but declare error with hasmember might do the trick there, too.
>
> -matthew
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Kristof Jozsa <kristof.jozsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'd like to ask for help with two policy enforcement rules:
>> - enforce a class having no constructor with arguments (a default or a
>> parameterless constructor is fine)
>> - enforce an annotated field being of a certain type
>>
>> For the second one I currently enforce the get() of the field which is not
>> too bad, but would be nicer to disallow the field declaration.. if possible.
>>
>> Can anyone show me an example doing these tricks?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> K
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> @matthewadams12
> mailto:matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> skype:matthewadams12
> yahoo:matthewadams
> aol:matthewadams12
> google-talk:matthewadams12@xxxxxxxxx
> msn:matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://matthewadams.me
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>