Re: [aspectj-users] aspectj-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9

[Andrew Eisenberg <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi SK,

This list has no connection with the aopmetrics project.  You may get
some better help if you join the project mailing list or raise a bug
on the project's issue tracker (links are on the project home page).
FWIW, I was just able to download the project myself.  Perhaps
tigris.org was down temporarily.

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Kotrappa Sirbi <kotrappa06@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I want to use aopmetrics tool to compare OO Vs AO metrics, please somebody
> tell me, how and where i can get these aopmetrics tool,Aopmetrics tool
> download from http://aopmetrics.tigris.org/ is not working.Please help me.
>
> Thanking You,
>
> Regards
>
> SK
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:30 PM, <aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Send aspectj-users mailing list submissions to
>>        aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>        aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>        aspectj-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of aspectj-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>   1. New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11 (Pasturel)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:47:59 +0100
>> From: Pasturel <jean-louis.pasturel@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [aspectj-users] New feature of Aspectj 1.6.11
>> Message-ID: <4D03B94F.60906@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> I open a new thread to discuss the new feature of 1.6.11 about declare
>> annotation
>>
>> The M1 comes with the removal of an annotation of field like specified in
>> the readme :
>>
>> declare @field: int Foo.i: -@Anno;
>>
>> It gives me an idea with the + sign as this :
>> declare @field: int Foo.i: +@Anno(param=<newValue>);
>>
>> that means a force replace : if @Anno exists remove it and replaces with
>> the new parametrized @Anno.If not already exists creates it with the
>> parametrized Anno.
>>
>> Without the - sign and without  the + sign, it creates the Annotation on
>> field or if already exists throws an exception ( that is certainly the
>> current behavior =>  Andy?).
>>
>> What do you think about that ?
>>
>> JL PASTUREL
>>
>> <Andy_Post>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I didn't write about using it in that way as we don't 100% yet define
>> the rules there - well I might define it as undefined right now:)   It
>> might work right now but I'd need to confirm I want that ordering to
>> remain reliable and stable.  Any values you specify for the removal
>> are actually not used right now, the removal is done based solely on
>> the name - this means you'll get what you want if the removal runs
>> first.  I might add value matching enforcement later.  Yes, at some
>> point it will be added across all the declare annotation forms for
>> consistency.
>>
>> Andy
>> </Andy_Post>
>>
>>
>> On 9 December 2010 23:14,<jeanlouis.pasturel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>
>> >  I see that 1.6.11M1 includes removal Annotation for field.
>> >  Just a question :
>> >  Is this kind of declare annotation below, supported in the same aspect
>> > : ?
>> >
>> >  @Aspect
>> >  public class MyAspect
>> >  {
>> >  declare @field: int Foo.i: -@Anno(init=0);
>> >  declare @field: int Foo.i: @Anno(init=5);
>> >  ...
>> >
>> >  }
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>>
>>
>> End of aspectj-users Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9
>> ********************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>