[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] Exclusion of synthetic methods
|
Hi William,
Want to raise a bugzilla for that? I can't immediately think of a
reason not to do it.
Andy
On 14 October 2010 11:33, William Louth (JINSPIRED.COM)
<william.louth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like ModifiersPattern needs to be updated.
>
> static {
> modifierFlags = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
> int flag = 1;
> while (flag <= Modifier.STRICT) {
> String flagName = Modifier.toString(flag);
> modifierFlags.put(flagName, new Integer(flag));
> flag = flag << 1;
> }
> }
>
>
> public static final int STRICT = 0x00000800;
>
> // Bits not (yet) exposed in the public API either because they
> // have different meanings for fields and methods and there is no
> // way to distinguish between the two in this class, or because
> // they are not Java programming language keywords
> static final int BRIDGE = 0x00000040;
> static final int VARARGS = 0x00000080;
> static final int SYNTHETIC = 0x00001000;
> static final int ANNOTATION= 0x00002000;
> static final int ENUM = 0x00004000;
> static boolean isSynthetic(int mod) {
> return (mod & SYNTHETIC) != 0;
> }
>
>
> On 14/10/2010 17:59, William Louth (JINSPIRED.COM) wrote:
>
> Is it possible to use "synthetic" as a valid modifier label in a pointcut?
> Any specification of this modifier results in a parser exception. Maybe I am
> missing something.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
