Re: [aspectj-users] latest aspectj with Spring 2.5.6?

[Scott Bartram <scottb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Andy.

You're right - I'm more concerned with reducing the AOP memory footprint.  The profiling was mostly just for validating my comfort level :-)

I'm going to start testing 1.6.8 today and I'll let you know if we find any issues.


On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Andy Clement wrote:

> Hi Scott,
> 
> On 19 February 2010 08:59, Scott Bartram <scottb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Does AspectJ 1.6.8 work OK with Spring 2.5.6?  I'd really like to decrease the current memory footprint (> 100MB) in our application with AspectJ 1.6.4.
> 
> Interesting you should ask that!  Last week we were testing 1.6.8 with
> Spring 2.5.X and Spring 3.0.X.  With Spring 3.0 it works fine, with
> Spring 2.5 I've had one problem reported but been unable to recreate
> the issue myself.  There is no reason I know of why it shouldnt work.
> 
>> Is there a way to turn on the pointcut profiling messages when just using Spring AOP (no ajc or LTW) in a JBoss container?
> 
> Hmm, this is possible if the right set of options could be passed to
> the weaver to set it up.  However, I think it is probably of limited
> usefulness given that Spring AOP only supports execution join points.
> Per the articles I wrote on performance, method-execution matching is
> one of the most optimized areas, so I'd hope with 1.6.8 you wouldn't
> see any slowness that would need profiling :)  If you truly think
> there is slowness there, post upgrade to 1.6.8, I can do a bit of
> digging to see how the options might be passed.
> 
> cheers,
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users