[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] declare @method syntax - is composite signature allowed??

Hi Simeon,

This restriction you've uncovered was actually only recently raised as
this enhancement:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=287613

To support it I need to change the serialized form of the attributes -
I try not to do this often but for other reasons (optimization) I may
be changing the format in 1.6.7 so I will be looking at it in that
timeframe.

> declare @method :
>                public * *..I*Dao+.*(..) && !public * *..I*Dao+.set*(..):
>                        @Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");

a clunky approach might be:

declare @method: public * *..I*Dao+.set*(..): @Setter;
declare @method: !@Setter public * *..I*Dao+.*(..):
@Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");

but I know that's not great...

Andy

2009/10/26 Leyzerzon, Simeon <simeon.leyzerzon@xxxxxxxx>:
> I have a hierarchy of DAO classes into which I'm introducing an @Cacheable annotation via something like this:
>
> declare @method :
>                public * *..I*Dao+.*(..) :
>                        @Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");
>
> The problem is, we need to filter out more than is specified by this one signature pattern, and I'm not sure that a composite pattern is allowed in this type of expression.  When I tried something like this:
>
> declare @method :
>                public * *..I*Dao+.*(..) && !public * *..I*Dao+.set*(..):
>                        @Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");
>
> I'm getting compile errors saying:
>
> Syntax error on token "&&", ";" expected
>
> I also tried to define composite pointcuts representing the joint points I'm interested in (basically I want to exclude 'jdbcTemplate' and 'slq' Spring specific setters from the places where annotation is introduced) but declaration syntax doesn't seem to like it either.
>
> What would be a good approach in the use case I described?
>
> I'm using compile time weaving via Ant.  AspectJ version is 1.6
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Simeon
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>