[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] declare @method syntax - is composite signature allowed??
|
Hi Simeon,
This restriction you've uncovered was actually only recently raised as
this enhancement:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=287613
To support it I need to change the serialized form of the attributes -
I try not to do this often but for other reasons (optimization) I may
be changing the format in 1.6.7 so I will be looking at it in that
timeframe.
> declare @method :
> public * *..I*Dao+.*(..) && !public * *..I*Dao+.set*(..):
> @Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");
a clunky approach might be:
declare @method: public * *..I*Dao+.set*(..): @Setter;
declare @method: !@Setter public * *..I*Dao+.*(..):
@Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");
but I know that's not great...
Andy
2009/10/26 Leyzerzon, Simeon <simeon.leyzerzon@xxxxxxxx>:
> I have a hierarchy of DAO classes into which I'm introducing an @Cacheable annotation via something like this:
>
> declare @method :
> public * *..I*Dao+.*(..) :
> @Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");
>
> The problem is, we need to filter out more than is specified by this one signature pattern, and I'm not sure that a composite pattern is allowed in this type of expression. When I tried something like this:
>
> declare @method :
> public * *..I*Dao+.*(..) && !public * *..I*Dao+.set*(..):
> @Cacheable(modelId="fooModel");
>
> I'm getting compile errors saying:
>
> Syntax error on token "&&", ";" expected
>
> I also tried to define composite pointcuts representing the joint points I'm interested in (basically I want to exclude 'jdbcTemplate' and 'slq' Spring specific setters from the places where annotation is introduced) but declaration syntax doesn't seem to like it either.
>
> What would be a good approach in the use case I described?
>
> I'm using compile time weaving via Ant. AspectJ version is 1.6
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Simeon
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>