Re: [aspectj-users] Joinpoint method signature matches superclass and no

[Oliver Böhm <boehm@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Steve,

I guess, it is the constructor call "new C()" who causes the warning, 
because it has no annotation.

rggards
Oliver



Steve reds schrieb:
> Hi, I'm having trouble creating a method signature and I wonder if it is FaD.
>
> I'm trying to create a pattern for 'declare warning' that identifies all method calls to classes that do not have the annotation - @PublicAPI. The annotation is on the referenced class, not its methods.
>
> The pattern I am using is:
> declare warning : call(* (!@PublicAPI *).*(..)) : "Non public API usage";
>
> In the following case I don't expect a warning but one is generated:
>
> public class Main
> {
>     public static void main(String[] args) {
>         // Generates warning even though C is @PublicAPI
>         new C().doIt();
>     }
> }
>
> @PublicAPI
> class C implements IC
> {
>     public void doIt() {
>     }
> }
>
> public interface IC
> {
>     public void doIt();
> }
>
> Shouldn't the signature match doIt() in C and not the one in IC since only C is referenced in Main?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
>       
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

--
Oliver Böhm
http://www.javatux.de