Re: [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents

From: João Paulo Sabino de Moraes <jonamep@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:55:02 -0300
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jCxIS8Oenab/AH8JgtD2jF9JCSvSG/OZetZ1Jnk9r9YNBZNCflFmin/L5orlMmXXlr PFWW60Jyw62Yo8vkoLV9FI12GeIQezvId0e6pDHn8xYPH7eyJSkYPqb9dkYm5LQBeXlB RZgkWDKJKT4qvPrk5Mc6kN7f0at6IGLwQ7fCA=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

There is no problem, I'm sure his solution will work, I was just wondering know if is there a way to intercept the method defined in just one instance of the event (instantiated at m1()), by this way there was no need to verify the event reference to know from where the event was handled.

jp

References:
- [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents
  - From: João Paulo Sabino de Moraes
- Re: [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents
  - From: Tahir Akhtar
- Re: [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents
  - From: João Paulo Sabino de Moraes
- Re: [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents
  - From: Andy Clement

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] Compile time weaving happening, LTW not working
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] Annotations to pieces of advice
Previous by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] Aspects and Ecents
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] Compile time weaving happening, LTW not working
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs