Re: [aspectj-users] stack overflow during "delete and update aspectjmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] stack overflow during "delete and update aspectjmarkers"

From: Justin Case <send_lotsa_spam_here@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QKPSrPNZuJprVWxKuv4J+EVzL0fARnFDIPgSFWBiRPaJXiqLI9Zraia1zUYXNz1kj+fyL08TDvzGZ3zYAzArvl5ctzSV+m7wRvzmBWJaZVq7XLnB8s1wAhVd0tUquWkHvq3gqm1Ju0PU/Gg9pej0eLle9Wxf1C9Ki8sGxsdWjYo=;
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Oh, yes, this one also got solved by shuffling the versions around and making sure there are no old jars in Eclipse directories. I'm a happy guy :)

All the best,
JM

--- On Mon, 3/23/09, Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
> What version of AJDT/Eclipse are you using?
> 
> The current version of AJDT (1.6.4) does not have any recursive calls
> inside of AJCompilationUnit.getHandleFromMemento (although it does
> call super).
> 
> If this does not solve your problem, can you raise a bug and attach
> some code snippet that recreates this problem?

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] stack overflow during "delete and update aspectjmarkers"
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] pointcut for super.*(..)
Previous by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] stack overflow during "delete and update aspectjmarkers"
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] pointcut for super.*(..)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs