Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom? 
I think we have a bigger problem...  I see the same error happening on debug.  I re-ran tests against WebLogic in debug, and had nothing show up in the DB (I cleared the tables out beforehand).  Ran it again under Tomcat and it filled the tables up nicely.  So, I suspect that it never worked under WebLogic, that it was the Tomcat testing that was populating the tables.

I did get a massive amount of debug logging from both the debug and staging WebLogic servers - if you have the time and patience to dig through them, you can download them from a zip here: http://laccetti.com/files/AOP tests.zip

I appreciate all of the effort you are putting into this.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Laccetti
> Sent: February-09-09 6:06 PM
> To: 'aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
> 
> I'll give it a shot. (Both turn on debug in debug and verbose in
> staging.)
> 
> Mike
> --------------------------
> Michael Laccetti
> 416-558-9718
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <aspectj-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon Feb 09 17:46:26 2009
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
> 
> I am half wondering if the ClassNotFoundExceptions are entirely red
> herrings.  They are not nice (and indicate I think we have a bug) but
> it is rare that anyone turns on AspectJ trace - I suspect if you turned
> on trace on your working cluster, you might well see them!  So, going
> back to the original note, I would like to know how the AOP stuff is
> actually not working?  In your aop.xml you can turn on -verbose, and
> additionally -showWeaveInfo as another option which will tell us if the
> weaver is advising where you want to advise.
> 
> cheers,
> Andy.
> 
> 
> 2009/2/9 Michael Laccetti <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 	I love straw grasping.  :)
> 
> 
> 
> 	I've attached the stack, from just a bit before the exceptions,
> to just after.  Let me know if there is anything else I can dig up.  (I
> forgot to turn on verbose in the config file; next release will have
> that.)
> 
> 
> 
> 	Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 	From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Clement
> 	Sent: February-09-09 4:14 PM
> 
> 	To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 	Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] WebLogic 9.2 + AspectJ = boom?
> 
> 
> 
> 	Hi Michael,
> 
> 
> 
> 	I see you are also having a problem for another type there, and
> it also trying multiple prefixes: java.lang, and
> com.cryptologic.bsg.aspect:
> com.cryptologic.bsg.aspect.com.cryptologic.bsg.service.impl.EcashPlayer
> AccountServiceImpl
> 
> 	As the -Xset option did not fix it - that suggests the
> classloader is OK (but I guess we might have known that as it deploys
> fine on your other system).
> 
> 	Do you have the full stack traces for the ClassNotFound problems?
> Very peculiar that the java.lang. prefixed CNFE comes out before the
> CNFE for the non-prefixed version.
> 
> 	I'm kind of grasping at straws here - since it works on one
> system but not on the other, I'm finding it difficult to work out what
> AJ might be doing wrong, or what assumption it is making that isn't
> valid across all configurations.
> 
> 	Is there by any chance another older copy of the code in some
> other jar in the system configuration or on the classpath ?  If an old
> version of the application/aspect got loaded by a different loader
> (maybe a loader higher in the loader hierarchy), then anything below
> that loader in the classloader hierarchy would not be visible to the
> weaver.  Is the classpath different in any way across these
> configurations?
> 
> 	Andy.
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	aspectj-users mailing list
> 	aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 	https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Back to the top