[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] Binary weaving of a package structure
|
Ah, that's what I missed! Thanks a lot for the hint Andy, it's working fine now.
Can I ask why '-d .' is not the default behavior? Also the Development
Guide I think is not very clear about what -d does. I read over the
options before, but since it was already placing the class files in
the current directory, I did not try to specify that explicitly.
~David
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add -d to specify a destination?
>
> -d .
>
> Andy.
>
> 2008/8/6 David Mohr <dmohr@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I might be overlooking something in the docs, but ajc behaves funny
>> when I try to binary weave a whole package structure. Let's say I have
>> a layout like:
>>
>> ---snip---
>> aspects/
>> InstrumentFoo.aj
>> InstrumentFoo.class
>> prog1/
>> com/
>> foo/
>> a/
>> X.class
>> b/
>> Y.class
>> prog1.aj/
>> ---snap---
>>
>> If I'm in prog1.aj/ and execute something like "ajc -aspectpath
>> ../aspects -classpath ../prog1 -inpath ../prog1", I end up with both
>> X.class and Y.class in prog1.aj/, without the whole package directory
>> structure that is present in prog1. Why are the directories not
>> created? And what is the right way to binary weave a whole java
>> program?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ~David
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
