Re: [aspectj-users] privileged generic aspect

["Eric Bodden" <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Could the "public" be the problem? What meaning would "public" have?

Eric

2008/6/3 Charles Zhang <zhangcharles@xxxxxxxxx>:
> public privileged aspect Test<T> {
>
> }
>
> I get a parsing error on this. But I can't find in the doc. why this is disallowed. Can I have generic privileged aspects?
>
>  Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>



-- 
Eric Bodden
Sable Research Group
McGill University, Montréal, Canada