[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] Order of annotation and static relevant?
|
- From: "Eric Bodden" <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:07:01 -0400
- Delivered-to: aspectj-users@eclipse.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=XVCd5jHil1tV4R58ELw44Lm7OZr/7LI4MBGID3YdBrk=; b=sm83TV9tft1aX+WX93gzL8H/vbwgkDe/0cA4lQafkvD76puRSHdsGUnhEzvyFNKPP1V5r/7F4ilqeBTD//3MARVw2PQeVxyVoZDblnnqR8QCJd7vVskMtpyaQKcz9tSPDFOIxXMwOV9U9tNyRxiyzl0whoVgoIlnXJSw5gf6B10=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=d5XlLjq5KECWAEHrOiJmWCvf86vvo0EZN3wl7O33LprdQu4p17U+Z3/XKXC8FrIv9mdiJNu5T2YStsdRn3HHInqBqokfim9KifsDuucrliBLRrMDqHwLACTm/RsSAfiL62D1as0Waptg9d8bEyfP9lxwOVzaaTCgoJ3Jk4UPWb0=
> declare error : execution(static @A * *(..)) : "Does not work";
I think this pattern describes that the return value is annotated. It
is equivalent to:
execution(static (@A *) *(..))
Since you don't annotate any of the return types, this does not match.
(no 100% guarantee on that one though)
Eric
--
Eric Bodden
Sable Research Group
McGill University, Montréal, Canada