Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects

The logs date is 20080511215715 and the build date is 20080510020449
so on this occasion the
build machine has gone bad - uploading the changes list but not the
build with the fix in.
Wait for a build dated after the bug was closed, should be later today.

Andy.

2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <markstobbe@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Thank you for the quick fix, however, seeing from the logs the current build
> *should* have the fix included, but as I try to compile the code with the
> new libraries, it does not work.
>
>  Maybe somebody broke just after you fixed it?
>
>  Mark
>
>  --------------------------------------------------
>  From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>  Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 4:06 AM
>
>
>  To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects
>
>
> > Fixed just now as https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=231478
> > . Fix will be in next dev build of AspectJ.
> >
> > You may find other issues as you head into this area, do feel free to
> > raise bugzilla entries for anything you encounter.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Andy.
> >
> > 2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <markstobbe@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > Ok, thank you for your fast reply. I hope it can be fixed soon, as it
> would
> > > be useful for me.. then again.. you are probably already busy enough :)
> > >
> > >  Just for the sake of completeness, here is a (not so much) working test
> > > case:
> > >
> > >
> > >  /* Error message: Type B does not meet the specification for type
> parameter
> > > 1 (A extends Base) in generic type GenericAspectA */
> > >  abstract aspect GenericAspectA<A extends Base> {}
> > >  abstract aspect GenericAspectB<B extends SubBase> extends
> GenericAspectA<B>
> > > {}
> > >
> > >  /* Base extends SubBase extends SubSubBase */
> > >  class Base {}
> > >  class SubBase extends Base {}
> > >  class SubSubBase extends SubBase {}
> > >
> > >  /* Plain Java implementation */
> > >  class GenericA<A extends Base> {}
> > >  class GenericB<B extends SubBase> extends GenericA<B> {}
> > >
> > >
> > >  Good luck!
> > >  Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  --------------------------------------------------
> > >  From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >  Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 8:55 PM
> > >  To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >  Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Mark,
> > > >
> > > > The docs only say (
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/generics-inAspectJ5.html
> > > > ):
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > AspectJ 5 allows an abstract aspect to be declared as a generic
> type.
> > > Any concrete aspect extending a generic abstract aspect must extend a
> > > parameterized version of the abstract aspect.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That page of the doc also shows some examples of a hierarchy of
> > > > abstract generic aspects, although none of them alter the bounds in
> > > > the way your example does.  So the fact that your code won't compile
> > > > is a bug that needs fixing.
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > Andy.
> > > >
> > > > 2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <markstobbe@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > First of all, I know this is not possible, as it says on the manual
> > > page..
> > > > > but I was wondering why..
> > > > > In plain Java you can redefine the upperbound of a type parameter, >
> > i.e.:
> > > > >
> > > > > class AbstractComponent<C extends Component> {}
> > > > > class AbstractWindow<W extends Window> extends AbstractComponent<W>
> > > {}
> > > > >
> > > > > Now.. trying the same thing with aspects.. does not work:
> > > > >
> > > > > abstract aspect AbstractComponentA<C extends Component> {}
> > > > > abstract aspect AbstractWindowA<W extends Window> extends
> > > > > AbstractComponentA<W> {}
> > > > >
> > > > > So.. my question, why isn't this supported? And what would be the >
> > "best"
> > > > > workaround?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > Mark
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > >  aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > >  aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > >
> > >
> > >  _______________________________________________
> > >  aspectj-users mailing list
> > >  aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  aspectj-users mailing list
>  aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>


Back to the top