| Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects |
/* Base extends SubBase extends SubSubBase */
class Base {}
class SubBase extends Base {}
class SubSubBase extends SubBase {}/* Plain Java implementation */
class GenericA<A extends Base> {}
class GenericB<B extends SubBase> extends GenericA<B> {}
Good luck! Mark
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 8:55 PM To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Generic aspects
Hi Mark,
The docs only say ( http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/adk15notebook/generics-inAspectJ5.html ):
AspectJ 5 allows an abstract aspect to be declared as a generic type. Any concrete aspect extending a generic abstract aspect must extend a parameterized version of the abstract aspect.
That page of the doc also shows some examples of a hierarchy of abstract generic aspects, although none of them alter the bounds in the way your example does. So the fact that your code won't compile is a bug that needs fixing.
cheers, Andy.
2008/5/11 Mark Stobbe <markstobbe@xxxxxxxxx>:_______________________________________________
Hello,
First of all, I know this is not possible, as it says on the manual page..
but I was wondering why..
In plain Java you can redefine the upperbound of a type parameter, i.e.:
class AbstractComponent<C extends Component> {} class AbstractWindow<W extends Window> extends AbstractComponent<W> {}
Now.. trying the same thing with aspects.. does not work:
abstract aspect AbstractComponentA<C extends Component> {} abstract aspect AbstractWindowA<W extends Window> extends AbstractComponentA<W> {}
So.. my question, why isn't this supported? And what would be the "best" workaround?
Thanks in advance, Mark _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users