| My guess is that the aspect's field shadows the class' original field, in the same way that a local variable in a method can shadow a field. I'm just speculating, based on the observed behavior. dean On Feb 5, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Dehua Zhang wrote:
Hi Gijs,
In my sample code, the aspect is modified with "privileged", so private fields of classes is also visible to the aspect, considering this, do you think there is conflict?
--
Dehua Zhang
Sable Research Group, McGill University
Montréal, Québec, Canada
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dzhang25
-----Original Message-----
From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gijs Peek
Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 14:16
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] field name conflict
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is intended behavior (i.e., no bug). The private inter-type field
is privately visible to the aspect, and as such does not conflict with
the private member in the class.
See
http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/semantics-declare.html#access-modifiers
for details.
cheers,
- Gijs Peek
Dehua Zhang wrote:
See the sample code below,
public class OneType {
private String r;
}
privileged aspect A {
private int OneType.r; //no error
}
Since aspect A is declared as privileged, so it should have access to
the private filed "String OneType.r", therefore, the ITD "int OneType.r"
is conflict with the "String OneType.r", I got no warning regarding this.
However, I got an error for the following code,
privileged aspect A {
public int OneType.r; //[error] inter-type declaration from A
conflicts with existing member: java.lang.String onType.r
}
Is this an intended behavior or a bug? I tried both 1.5.4 and
DEVELOPMENT-20080125213731.
--
Dehua Zhang
Sable Research Group, McGill University
Montréal, Québec, Canada
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dzhang25
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=w2QV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
Dean Wampler, Ph.D. dean at objectmentor.com See also:
|
