[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] AOP breaks modularity question
|
>> I often heard than there's a group of people saying that AOP breaks
modularity
Well, if someone insists on breaking their teeth, it does not really
matter which stone they use to do it, a brick is as good as marble
On Jan 22, 2008 3:29 AM, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I don't want to start a flame and my question is not really the one in the
> subject. I often heard than there's a group of people saying that AOP breaks
> modularity, and another (which I agree with) that says that it improves
> modularity. One reason used from the latter is that the OOP programmers
> usually breaks modularity to reach their aims. This is the sentence I'd like
> to investigate, because I'm not sure I get it well. I think that, since
> modules must combined together to build up a complete system, such modules
> must provide ways to interact each other, thus breaking their modularity or
> better their "isolation". Is this what that sentence means? Any pointer to
> documentation, examples, or papers?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Luca
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
