[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[aspectj-users] Re: aspectj-users Digest, Vol 34, Issue 31
|
On Dec 16, 2007 10:31 PM, <
aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Send aspectj-users mailing list submissions to
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
aspectj-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of aspectj-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1.Re:Aspect Mining & AOP ( S Kotrappa)
Re: Inter-Type constructor ( Alexandru Popescu ? )
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:16:24 +0200
From: " Alexandru Popescu ? " <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] Inter-Type constructor
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID:
<c6f400460712160416i49f61107q6498d444b8d04171@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Dec 16, 2007 2:11 PM, Rui Carlos Gonçalves <rui.c.a.g@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No. I think you can't redefine a method/constructor. You just can create new
> methods/contructors, but the empty constructor is always defnided (for you,
> or for the compiler). So, to redifine this constructor, probably you will
> have to use 'around'.
>
I don't think Eric suggested replacing the constructor, but rather
"injecting" the ITD constructor code into the compiler defined one.
./alex
--
.w( the-mindstorm )p.
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2007 2:04 AM, Renato Rodrigues <
renatolmsrodrigues@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > So i have to define an empty constructor so i can redefine it with
> inter-type declaration? I can't just add a constructor like i can add a
> method?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 15, 2007 11:50 PM, Rui Carlos Gonçalves < rui.c.a.g@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I think in Java if you don't create a empty constructor, the compiler
> will do that. So, you are trying redefine a constructor already exists. If
> you try 'public Client.new(int x)' instead of 'public
Client.new ()' you
> don't have any error. Maybe you can use 'Client around() :
> call(Client.new()) {...}' in your case.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rui Gonçalves
> > >
> > >
> > > PS: sorry by bad english :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 15, 2007 4:02 PM, Renato Rodrigues <
renatolmsrodrigues@xxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I want to define the Client constructor in the aspect instead of the
> class itself. Shouldn't it be like this? The compiler says :
> > > > inter-type declaration from declare_question.X conflicts with existing
> member: void declare_question.Client.<init>() ola/src/declare_question
> X.aj line 6
> > > > ------------------------------------------
> > > > package declare_question;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > package declare_question;
> > > >
> > > > public class Client {
> > > >
> > > > public static void main(String[] args) {
> > > > Client o = new Client();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > package declare_question;
> > > >
> > > > public aspect X {
> > > >
> > > > public Client.new(){
> > > > System.out.println("cliente");
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
>
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
End of aspectj-users Digest, Vol 34, Issue 31
*********************************************
Hi!! Friends,
We are working on Aspect Mining-AOP and
looking for better clustering algorithms and scope for future research algorithms in aspect mining: k-means (KM), fuzzy c-means
(FCM) and hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC).Please help us any aspectj or Soot Frame work users working on these topics to dicuss & help each others.
thanking you,
regards
--
Prof S Kotrappa
Assistant Prof,
Department of CSE/MCA
KLES's College of Engg., & Technology
Belgaum-India.
