[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] Re: aspectj-users Digest, Vol 31, Issue 12
|
Yep - raise a defect on that.
On 17/09/2007, Michael McCray <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you for your help Andy.
>
> I tried moving my code to the same file, and I got my test case to
> work by including the interface that I introduced as a parent to the
> target class. It seems that if this is in another file it does not
> work, should I file a defect?
>
> It seems odd to me that the ITD method is "within" the aspect as
> opposed to the target of the introduction. I guess this makes sense
> because it is declared in the same file as the aspect, but it could
> make sense to me either way I guess.
>
> In the case of an interface with no methods, it might as well just be
> declared in the aspect since there is no code to it.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
