Re: [aspectj-users] Good Techniques of Tracing

["Eric Bodden" <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, I think as an alternative, you can also just import the
type. That should work, too.

Eric

On 12/07/07, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh, right. That is indeed really subtle. AspectJ assumes a fully
> qualified type if you do not use any wildcards. That's really subtle.
> (Add negation using "!" and you get completely lost ;-).) You can
> match any package using *.. as in:
>
> call(* *..ArquivoTcs.*(..))
>
> Eric
>
> On 12/07/07, ramilani12 <ramilani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello Guys
> > I fixed my problem , this skill:
> >
> > pointcut traceMethods():  execution(* escala.engine.ArquivoTcs.*(..) ) ||
> > call(* escala.engine.ArquivoTcs.*(..))
> >     && !within(TraceAspect);
> >
> > before(): traceMethods()
> >     {
> >         if ( log.isEnabledFor(Level.INFO) )
> >         {
> >             Signature sig =
> > thisJoinPointStaticPart.getSignature();
> >             log.log(Level.INFO , "Entering [
> > "+sig.getDeclaringType().getName()+" .
> > "+sig.getName()+"]");
> >         }
> >     }
> >
> > I need specify which package and sub package which the Class it belongs
> > Why that? , what´s difference between specify package and sub package and
> > don´t specify package and sub package?
> >  I don´t understand?!
> > I use Eclipse 3.3 and last version AspectJ
> >
> >
> > Nice twist Eric about pointcut doctor , but bad only run on Eclipse 3.2 and
> > AJDT 1.4
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/12/07, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I agree that it looks like a totally useful feature. I think as soon
> > > as this will get into AJDT, the traffic on this mailing list may
> > > decrease quite a bit. ;-)
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > On 12/07/07, Andy Clement < andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > they have some small changes to the weaver that are open as bug
> > > > reports for us to address.
> > > >
> > > > On 12/07/07, Barry Kaplan < groups1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Sigh. I just saw that they /replace/ the aspectj-weaver, which will
> > > > > almost certainly mean using an old version. And also only ajdt 1.4 is
> > > > > supported. This is really too bad. Are there any plans to add this
> > > > > capability into the main aspectj product?
> > > > >
> > > > > -barry
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Kaplan wrote:
> > > > > > Eric Bodden wrote:
> > > > > >> I can't see anything wrong with it. Is your setup correct? You
> > might
> > > > > >> want to try the pointcut doctor:
> > http://pointcutdoctor.cs.ubc.ca/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wow! pointcutdoctor is amazing. This plugin needs some marketing. I
> > > > > > have never gotten a hint of it before now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -barry
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eric Bodden
> > > Sable Research Group
> > > McGill University, Montréal, Canada
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > raphael milani
> > :=]
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Eric Bodden
> Sable Research Group
> McGill University, Montréal, Canada


--
Eric Bodden
Sable Research Group
McGill University, Montréal, Canada