Re: [aspectj-users] @DeclareParents and this.getClass()

[Roland Reckel <rreckel@xxxxxx>]

I tried to do exactly the same aspect using "code style" and it worked
perfectly. But in the doc I found this:
"Whichever style you use, the AspectJ weaver ensures that your program
has exactly the same semantics."

I think this is not true! "this" returns different instances in the
different styles.

Is this a bug in the annotation style or is this intended?!?!?

I really like the annotation style with the LTW (very flexible and
dynamic, can even compile in Continuum without ajc etc......), but for
now it is unusable to me :-((

Please help!

Thanks

On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:50 +0200, Roland Reckel wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I have a problem with the @DeclareParents annotation:
> this.getClass() returns the implementation class of the Aspect and not
> the "aspected" class.
> 
> Is this a bug? Or does any other method exist to get the aspected class?
> BTW: I use AspectJ 1.5.3
> 
> Here an example:
> 
> @Aspect
> public class PersistenceAspect {
> 
>     public interface IPersistentObject {
>         void store();
> 
>         void delete();
>     }
> 
>     public static class PersistentObjectImpl implements
> IPersistentObject {
> 
>         public void store() {
>         }
> 
>         public void delete() {
> 		System.out.println("Class: " + this.getClass())  // Does return
> PersistentAspect$PersistentObjectImpl  !?!?!?!?
>         }
>     }
> 
>     @DeclareParents(value = "@lu.vdl.trasal.annotation.PersistentObject
> *", defaultImpl = PersistentObjectImpl.class)
>     private IPersistentObject implementedInterface;
> 
> }
> 
> 
> Does anybody have the same problem? (I found some mails with the same
> problem but no answer or bug report :-((
> 
> Thx for your help
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users