|Re: [aspectj-users] Re: Using args in LTW|
You can raise a bug for the failure but the -XnoInline is a suitable
workaround for now. XnoInline means we do not inline around advice,
we generate closure classes instead. Inlined code is faster.
On 09/02/07, Craig Ching <craigching@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I hadn't, no. I just tried that and, indeed, it now works. Looking at the
> docs, it's not clear to me that this is what I'm supposed to do. Is it?
> What are the implications of doing this?
> Should I be pursuing a defect? Or are you saying that this is correct
> Thanks for the help!
> On 2/9/07, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > Have you tried putting "-XnoInline" as an option in your weaver
> > options within aop.xml to see if that helps?
> > Andy.
> aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users mailing list