[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] Re: Using args in LTW
|
Ok, thanks Andy, I'll raise a defect. I'd be happy to dig a bit deeper if someone were willing to guide me.
Cheers,
Craig
On 2/9/07, Andy Clement
<andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can raise a bug for the failure but the -XnoInline is a suitable
workaround for now. XnoInline means we do not inline around advice,
we generate closure classes instead. Inlined code is faster.
Andy.
On 09/02/07, Craig Ching <craigching@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I hadn't, no. I just tried that and, indeed, it now works. Looking at the
> docs, it's not clear to me that this is what I'm supposed to do. Is it?
> What are the implications of doing this?
>
> Should I be pursuing a defect? Or are you saying that this is correct
> behavior?
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Cheers,
> Craig
>
>
> On 2/9/07, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > Have you tried putting "-XnoInline" as an option in your weaver
> > options within aop.xml to see if that helps?
> >
> > Andy.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
>
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
