Re: [aspectj-users] Bug related to Annotations on constructors

["Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>]

looks like a bug - please raise it.

On 21/09/06, Paulo Alexandre Corigo Zenida <paulo.zenida@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have found something that I believe it is a bug related to
> annotations on constructors. The code is the following:
>
> public class A {
>
>         @MyAnnotation
>         public A() {
>                 new B();
>         }
>
>         @MyAnnotation
>         public A(int i) {
>                 new B(i);
>         }
>
>         public static void main(String[] args) {
>                 new A();
>                 new A(1);
>         }
> }
>
> public class B {
>
>         @MyAnnotation
>         public B() {
>
>         }
>
>         @MyAnnotation
>         public B(int i) {
>
>         }
> }
>
> @Target(ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR)
> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
> public @interface MyAnnotation {
>
> }
>
> public aspect MyAspect {
>
>         before() :
>                 call(@MyAnnotation *.new(..)) {
>                 System.out.println(thisJoinPoint);
>         }
> }
>
> The result:
>
> call(pt.iscte.ci.test.A())
> call(pt.iscte.ci.test.A(int))
>
> Why aren't the calls to B() and B(int) matched and shown in the output?
> If I change the pointcut to call(*.new(..)), the output is the expected:
>
> call(pt.iscte.ci.test.A())
> call(pt.iscte.ci.test.B())
> call(pt.iscte.ci.test.A(int))
> call(pt.iscte.ci.test.B(int))
>
> This is a bug, right?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paulo Zenida
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Mensagem enviada usando o IMP (Internet Messaging Program).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users