Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint SourceLocation vs. Stack Trace Interigatio

["Wes" <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The static part is known at compile-time - no reflective overhead.

http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.eclipse.org+thisJoinPointStaticPart

  "Using thisJoinPointStaticPart will avoid the run-time creation of the
   join point object that may be necessary when using thisJoinPoint directly"

  http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/progguide/language-thisJoinPoint.html

Wes

> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Gregory Kedge <greg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, Sep-2-2006 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] JoinPoint SourceLocation vs. Stack Trace Interigation
>
> I haven't. I will do diligence to figure out what advantage  
> thisJoinPointStaticPart will bring to me, but if you(or anyone else)  
> can share with me what you expect me to discover, please do...
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Greg Kedge
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 2, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Eric Eide wrote:
> 
> > "Gregory" == Gregory Kedge <greg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > 	Gregory> It is my understanding that the use of JoinPoint is a
> > 	Gregory> reflective operation.  [...]
> >
> > Have you considered using `thisJoinPointStaticPart'?
> >
> > Eric.
> >
> > -- 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > ---------
> > Eric Eide <eeide@xxxxxxxxxxx>  .         University of Utah School  
> > of Computing
> > http://www.cs.utah.edu/~eeide/ . +1 (801) 585-5512 voice, +1 (801)  
> > 581-5843 FAX
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>