[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [aspectj-users] pointcut for synchronized block
- From: "Ron Bodkin" <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:11:59 -0700
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Organization: New Aspects of Software
- Thread-index: AcWMcS3I37WHBUYCT9Cj2mx/OggQ1UZSD/RAAASZHQA=
Note that there has been some work in the ajc compiler recently to support
synchronization join points: -Xjoinpoints:synchronization although look in
BcelClassWeaver.transformSynchronizedMethod for at least one part of the
work in progress as well as a note by Andy about what's left to do. This was
committed about a month ago.
[mailto:aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric Bodden
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:52 AM
Subject: RE: [aspectj-users] pointcut for synchronized block
I just read your posting again... I have somebody who thought about
working on this issue. Obviously, we don't want to reinvent the wheel.
Hence, it would be great if you could briefly comment on whether you
succeeded and if not, what you found to be the major problem. (I know
it's not an easy issue to implement this correctly, especially if you
want around advice.)
Thanks a lot!
P.S. I tried to email you but your address does not work anymore, hence
the posting to the list.
Sable Research Group, McGill University
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hale Scott C 1stLt AFIT/ENG
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:50 AM
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aspectj-users] pointcut for synchronized block
> I am developing a pointcut to determine all the locks held at any time
> during the execution of a program. The pointcut needs to capture the
> current thread and object being locked during a synchronized block.
> have yet to determine a unique signature to determine when the code
> contains a synchronized block using Aspects. Has any one come across
> this problem? Does any one have any possible suggestions for a
> solution? I appreciate the help.
aspectj-users mailing list