[aspectj-users] Weaving with aspectJ from different packages

[Trasca Virgil <virgil_trasca@xxxxxxxxx>]

    Hi all,

      I have 2 packages P1 and P2. With aspectj I want
to catch all calls from P2 to public interface of P1 +
some calls from P2 to P2. 

      I was able to do that by putting the aspectJ
code(aj file) into P2 and compiling with iajc the P2.
But I need to put the aspectJ code in a totally
separated package P3 and to get the same result. 
      Moving the aspectJ code(aj file) in package P3
and building P3 with iajc I am able to build with
SUCCESS but I am not getting any pointcut. What I am
wrong? Is not possible to catch calls from P2 to P1
and from P2 to P2 by putting the aspectJ code in a
separate package P3 and making iajc on P3?

Thanks a lot,
Virgil 

--- aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Send aspectj-users mailing list submissions to
> 	aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	aspectj-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of aspectj-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. RE: If pointcut and side effects (Eric Bodden)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 17:21:43 -0400
> From: "Eric Bodden" <eric.bodden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [aspectj-users] If pointcut and side
> effects
> To: <aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> 
>
<F3EB3B98C34E94498F1110B618E3717D5CAE0E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hello.
> 
> > Is it correct then to say that in the absence of
> if pointcuts with
> side
> > effects, the evaluation order does not matter? No
> other pointcut than
> > if can have side effects?
> 
> That should be correct, yes.
> 
>  
> > I understand you wonder where I want to go with
> this :) I'm doing
> > analysis of control and data dependencies in
> relation to faults in
> > pointcuts, and in such a scenario it could be
> useful to be able to
> > state things about control and data dependencies
> between the different
> > conditions of a pointcut.
> 
> I see.
> 
> > But relying on implementation decisions is
> > probably a bad thing anyway.
> 
> Certainly.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> 
> 
> End of aspectj-users Digest, Vol 16, Issue 4
> ********************************************
>