[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [aspectj-users] AJDT stability?

I still see cases where incremental compilation creates spurious errors like
inter-type declarations that conflict where a full rebuild fixes them. This
happens a lot less often. Much more annoyingly, I'm getting cases where the
compile fails but no output occurs, which of course won't execute correctly.
Perhaps that is what Jeppe is seeing?

I can't remember cases where the compiled result was wrong otherwise...

-----Original Message-----
From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Clement
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:00 AM
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT stability?

I have spent some time this afternoon investigating this problem of
the 'advice disappearing'.  I have found out how it occurs, but it
should only mean that the gutter markers are missing, the 'end result'
should execute just fine (fully advised) - apart from Jeppe, is anyone
else seeing that the result of an incremental compile fails to execute
correctly?

Andy.

On 25/04/06, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think this problem:
>
> > Often (especially after editting an aspect), advised methods are not
> > decorated until I do a clean build.
>
> is possibly dependent on what language features you are using because
> not everyone is affected.  To get to the bottom of it, can you tell me
> what features you are using? before/after/around advice? itds? per
> clauses? generics? what pointcuts - cflow? abstract aspects?
>
> Andy.
>
> On 24/04/06, Jeppe Cramon <jeppe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Btw. This happens on both 3.1.2 and 3.2M6.
> >
> > /Jeppe
> >
> > Jeppe Cramon wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > We experience from time to time that our code doesn't get advised. We
> > > have to clean the project(s) to get the properly weaved.
> > > We usually notice it at runtime when things bomb or NP's occur. Not so
> > > pleasant.
> > >
> > > /Jeppe
> > >
> > > Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> > >> How are others finding the stability of the AJDT?  I'm running latest
> > >> and greatest and see a lof of problems:
> > >>
> > >> Often (especially after editting an aspect), advised methods are not
> > >> decorated until I do a clean build.
> > >>
> > >> I get a goodly number of exceptions (with that panel that advises me
> > >> to "add a bug").
> > >>
> > >> Often, my aspects will not appear in the Type view.  Sometimes, even
a
> > >> restart of Eclipse does not fix this (though a close and re-open of
> > >> the project will!).
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > >> Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > >> Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > >> Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> > >>
> > >> Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > >> and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aspectj-users mailing list
> > >> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > >>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users