Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT stability?

["Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>]

Did you add a bug? or check for the exception stack trace in our
bugzilla list to see if its already raised/fixed? (Actually, our
bugzilla is googled so you search AJ bugzilla through google ).  If we
don't get bug reports for the stack traces shown in the 'add a bug'
popup, then we don't know there is anything to fix .... you might
think we already know about a problem if it is happening to you all
the time, but that is by no mean going to be the case... we run over
3000 testcases against every build of AspectJ before shipping it, but
that doesn't remotely cover all the possible usages AspectJ will be
put to by our users.

Andy.

On 25/04/06, Kaare Nilsen <kaare.nilsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The problem description that Howard posted in the first mail, also
> seems to describe my problems to the point.
> I have tried the lates/gratest on 3.1.2 && 3.2M6, using a compination
> og old-style aspects and @AspectJ syntax, and very often (more so than
> not) get a popup asking me to "add a bug".
> Then I need to make a clean build to get things normalized.
>
> Best regards
> Kaare Nilsen
>
> On 25/04/06, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have spent some time this afternoon investigating this problem of
> > the 'advice disappearing'.  I have found out how it occurs, but it
> > should only mean that the gutter markers are missing, the 'end result'
> > should execute just fine (fully advised) - apart from Jeppe, is anyone
> > else seeing that the result of an incremental compile fails to execute
> > correctly?
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > On 25/04/06, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I think this problem:
> > >
> > > > Often (especially after editting an aspect), advised methods are not
> > > > decorated until I do a clean build.
> > >
> > > is possibly dependent on what language features you are using because
> > > not everyone is affected.  To get to the bottom of it, can you tell me
> > > what features you are using? before/after/around advice? itds? per
> > > clauses? generics? what pointcuts - cflow? abstract aspects?
> > >
> > > Andy.
> > >
> > > On 24/04/06, Jeppe Cramon <jeppe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Btw. This happens on both 3.1.2 and 3.2M6.
> > > >
> > > > /Jeppe
> > > >
> > > > Jeppe Cramon wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > We experience from time to time that our code doesn't get advised. We
> > > > > have to clean the project(s) to get the properly weaved.
> > > > > We usually notice it at runtime when things bomb or NP's occur. Not so
> > > > > pleasant.
> > > > >
> > > > > /Jeppe
> > > > >
> > > > > Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> > > > >> How are others finding the stability of the AJDT?  I'm running latest
> > > > >> and greatest and see a lof of problems:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Often (especially after editting an aspect), advised methods are not
> > > > >> decorated until I do a clean build.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I get a goodly number of exceptions (with that panel that advises me
> > > > >> to "add a bug").
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Often, my aspects will not appear in the Type view.  Sometimes, even a
> > > > >> restart of Eclipse does not fix this (though a close and re-open of
> > > > >> the project will!).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > > > >> Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > > > >> Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > > > >> Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > > > >> and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > >> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>