Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT 1.3.1 Release Candidate

["Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>]

Alex,

They will match - you will see an AspectJ1.5.1a build next week - we
like to follow eclipse and its 'a' builds ;).  A structure model bug
and slightly more serious batch compilation bug were reported just
after we shipped 1.5.1.

Andy.

On 07/04/06, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> #: Matt Chapman changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date: 4/7/2006 1:33 PM) :#
> > The latest development build of AJDT 1.3.1.20060406092046 for Eclipse
> > 3.1 is the release candidate build. This can be obtained via the AJDT
> > download page:
> >     http://www.eclipse.org/ajdt/downloads/#dev
> > You can use either the update site or zip file - make sure you get the
> > 1.3.1 version and that you're using Eclipse 3.1 (the latest update,
> > Eclipse 3.1.2, is recommended).
> >
> > Please try this out if you can, and raise any problems in bugzilla. If
> > nothing too serious is found by early next week, we'll make the final
> > release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt.
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
>
> Hi Matt!
>
> I have a quick question: the version you are pointing is mentioning in the Cruise Control log:
>
> changing aj release to 1.5.1a
> updating aspectj version to be 1.5.2.20060406131057
>
> Now, it looks there will be again a small difference between the version of AJ in AJDT and the
> latest public release AJ version. I am wondering if it would be possible by the time AJDT is
> declared final to also distribute the corresponding AJ version. This would allow everybody to avoid
> possible conflicts between versions.
>
> tia,
>
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>