Re: [aspectj-users] How may I match join points in these patterns?

[Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>]

The only thing I can think of is Fowler's refactoring: do not use temp variables :-).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.

#: Matthew Webster changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date: 3/30/2006 11:36 AM) :#
> Sunny,
>
> Semantically (and in the byte-code which is what AspectJ uses) there is no 
> difference between what you have and the following:
>
> {
>         ClassA a = new ClassA()
>          return ( a );
> }
>
> { 
>         B b = new B();
>         objectA.m( b, arg1, arg2, ... );
> }
>
> What difference do you perceive?
>
> Matthew Webster
> AOSD Project
> Java Technology Centre, MP146
> IBM Hursley Park, Winchester,  SO21 2JN, England
> Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal) 
> Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/
> Please respond to aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> Sent by:        aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To:     aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> cc:      
> Subject:        [aspectj-users] How may I match join points in these 
> patterns?
>
>
> Dear All,
>  
> How may I match join points in the following two patterns?
>  
> 1. when an object is created and immediately returned to the caller:
>  
> public ClassA m1()
> {
>          return ( new ClassA() );
> }
>  
> 2. when an object is created and immediately passed to another context 
> through a method call:
>  
> objectA.m( new B(), arg1, arg2, ... );
>  
>  
> Thanks very much!
>  
> Sunny
>  
>  _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users