[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] How may I match join points in these patterns?
|
The only thing I can think of is Fowler's refactoring: do not use temp variables :-).
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
#: Matthew Webster changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date: 3/30/2006 11:36 AM) :#
Sunny,
Semantically (and in the byte-code which is what AspectJ uses) there is no
difference between what you have and the following:
{
ClassA a = new ClassA()
return ( a );
}
{
B b = new B();
objectA.m( b, arg1, arg2, ... );
}
What difference do you perceive?
Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/
Please respond to aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject: [aspectj-users] How may I match join points in these
patterns?
Dear All,
How may I match join points in the following two patterns?
1. when an object is created and immediately returned to the caller:
public ClassA m1()
{
return ( new ClassA() );
}
2. when an object is created and immediately passed to another context
through a method call:
objectA.m( new B(), arg1, arg2, ... );
Thanks very much!
Sunny
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
