RE: [aspectj-users] RE: [aspectj-dev] IDEA and AspectJ

["Ron Bodkin" <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Alex,

Did you do this before or after the IntelliJ open API came out with 5.0? I
wonder if it's any better... I'm also hoping that if they could participate
they could be guides to unclear code...

It seems like the new language API in their plugin support would be useful.
I will admit that the information isn't easy to find, e.g., how would one
hook in ant or ajc for building, or add gutter annotations. Presumably a
cross-references view would be relatively do-able...

-----Original Message-----
From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexandru Popescu
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:23 AM
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] RE: [aspectj-dev] IDEA and AspectJ

Hi Ron!

The project looks really interesting.
Unfortunately, my past experience developing plugins for IDEA stopped
tragically after a few days of wondering through undocumented sources
(by the time I have tried to write the TestNG plugin for IDEA).
Though, if things are gonna be settled down well, than I think I would
like to give a helping hand.

BR,

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.


On 3/9/06, Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On a related note, I'm curious if anyone would be interested in being part
> of an effort to develop an AspectJ plug-in for IDEA? It would be
interesting
> to reach out to JetBrains and to offer to collaborate to make a high
quality
> plugin available.
>
> We're working on a project where we'd really to have one and would
certainly
> contribute. I've seen some interesting past postings for integrating ant
> builds into IDEA. We sponsored Mik doing some initial work to expose
symbol
> information from ant builds, so that a plugin could pick them up to
> visualize them...
>
> (posted to aspectj-users to broaden the appeal :-))
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eugene Kuleshov
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:10 PM
> To: AspectJ developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] IDEA and AspectJ
>
>
>    Here is the story http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=5
>
>    And link to IDEA Wiki
>
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/IDEADEV/What%27s+New+In+Demetra
>
>    regards,
>    Eugene
>
>
> Mik Kersten wrote:
> > Interesting. If you or others see indication of this please post a
> reference
> > since it would make for a much easier integration story.  It makes sense
> > from their point of view--we made that same decision way back in 1.0
when
> we
> > were maintaining a separate Java compiler.
> >
> > Mik
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-
> >> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexandru Popescu
> > ...
> >> I've read/heard some rumours that the current dev builds are including
> >> Eclipse compiler... so maybe
> >> they are looking in the right direction.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-dev mailing list
> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users