Re: [aspectj-users] newbie AspectJ questions

[Adrian Colyer <adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx>]

I've had "look at domain object security with Acegi and AspectJ" on my
project list since December when Ben and I first discussed it at TSE.
It's definitely something I would like to collaborate on...

On 31/01/06, Luke Taylor <negaton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking at AspectJ a lot recently (just finishing Adrian et
> al's book at the moment) and I'm also a developer on the Acegi project.
>
> I suspect Ben has already had some discussions on this topic, but if you
> have some good ideas for improving (and extending) Acegi's use of
> AspectJ we'd love to hear them.
>
> cheers,
>
> Luke.
>
> Ron Bodkin wrote:
> > My apologies: it appears Outlook remembered how my message looked when I
> > switched from HTML to plain text mode, then transmitted the old copy...
> > Trying again:
> >
> > The Acegi Spring Security Framework's AspectJ integration expects a closure
> > to let it decide whether or not to proceed with the original request (i.e.,
> > it doesn't allow exceptions to abort processing).
> >
> > This coding style adds a lot of overhead, especially for fine-grained
> > security (since you can't use an exception to abort processing, and it
> > *requires* you to pass in a thisJoinPoint object).
> >
> > Maybe with Spring 2.0 Adrian can help improve Acegi's AspectJ integration...
> >
> > On the bright side, at least their example says it is based on an abstract
> > class (not an interface) and picks out a kind of join point (method
> > execution)...
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>  Luke Taylor.                      Monkey Machine Ltd.
>  PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C            http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>


--
-- Adrian
adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx