| Re: [aspectj-users] @AJ or conventional syntax? |
Please respond to aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
To:
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject:
Re: [aspectj-users]
@AJ or conventional syntax?
I was just wondering on this one... If one uses @AJ
syntax, his
aspects can be checked against a code coverage tool... Maybe no tool
supports AspectJ yet, I don't know...
2005/11/21, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>:
> #: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/21/2005
6:59 PM :#
> > Alexandru, why do you prefer @AJ syntax?
> >
>
> I am currently using the traditional AJ; but the reasons I was saying
I would start using the @aj are:
> - using the default compiler
> - Java editors are currently more advanced than the AJ editor
> - not all developers are using Eclipse
>
> Not very technical reasons, but for a team it is quite important to
avoid any frustrations and
> limitations.
>
> cheers,
>
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
>
> > 2005/11/21, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> #: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying
on 11/21/2005 2:58 PM :#
> >> > I would like to know if people are willing to move to
@AJ syntax when
> >> > possible, or prefer to continue with traditional syntax
even when
> >> > dealing with Java 5.
> >> >
> >> > Which one do people find better for reading?
> >> >
> >> > A major drawback I see with @AJ syntax is that it doesn't
allow me to
> >> > navigate through the marked join points (in Eclipse).
> >> >
> >> > I would like to hear from other users.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > aspectj-users mailing list
> >> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >> >
> >>
> >> As pointed in one of my previous mails I would migrate to
@AJ syntax immediately it reaches the
> >> richness of traditional approach. Unfortunately, at this
moment I don't have enough time to give it
> >> a chance, but I am keeping an eye on it and immediately I
feel it is there I will jump to use it.
> >>
> >> Matt how comes that these are complementary? Shouldn't be
the same think writting your code in @AJ
> >> or in traditional mode/style?
> >>
> >> ./alex
> >> --
> >> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aspectj-users mailing list
> >> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > !DSPAM:4381fcf0286044807410885!
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users