[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspectj-users] @AJ or conventional syntax?
- From: Eduardo Rocha <eduardorochabr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:59:04 -0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E+VnI/gqY+LCgIHx2OrYKLU4p7x3Y6YiHwsC09Gesp1Wpmw9bHjU/1XobuUOPTFBLQEWw8qNIKhnCtxiN/j4eVxfYiyyVddIXvEpHIMTRsCzc4Gj5V2ggn91w+Ig1xqLUx+Zmhkg2Oa1xC0AgLEcI+BcSpuKmuGfsVyhE3lAtjc=
Alexandru, why do you prefer @AJ syntax?
2005/11/21, Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>:
> #: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/21/2005 2:58 PM :#
> > I would like to know if people are willing to move to @AJ syntax when
> > possible, or prefer to continue with traditional syntax even when
> > dealing with Java 5.
> > Which one do people find better for reading?
> > A major drawback I see with @AJ syntax is that it doesn't allow me to
> > navigate through the marked join points (in Eclipse).
> > I would like to hear from other users.
> > Thanks.
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> As pointed in one of my previous mails I would migrate to @AJ syntax immediately it reaches the
> richness of traditional approach. Unfortunately, at this moment I don't have enough time to give it
> a chance, but I am keeping an eye on it and immediately I feel it is there I will jump to use it.
> Matt how comes that these are complementary? Shouldn't be the same think writting your code in @AJ
> or in traditional mode/style?
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> aspectj-users mailing list