[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] @AJ or conventional syntax?
|
Currently, AspectJ editor is not as "smart" as Java Editor (see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=111971 for example), are
people struggling with this, or it's OK? I really hope this can be
fixed for 1.5.0 final :)
2005/11/21, Rafal Krzewski <Rafal.Krzewski@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Eduardo Rocha wrote:
> > I would like to know if people are willing to move to @AJ syntax when
> > possible, or prefer to continue with traditional syntax even when
> > dealing with Java 5.
> >
> > Which one do people find better for reading?
> >
> > A major drawback I see with @AJ syntax is that it doesn't allow me to
> > navigate through the marked join points (in Eclipse).
>
> Definetely traditional AJ syntax. I may be wrong I don't see much
> purpose in @AJ syntax except for people migrating existing applications
> from AspectWerks.
> Maybe if would be also beneficial for people that cannot use AJDT for
> some reason, but have Java5 enabled IDE?
>
> my .02
> R.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
