Re: [aspectj-users] InterType: introducing serialVersionUID into @Persis

[Tomasz Nazar <Tomasz.Nazar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On the next beautiful day: Mon, 19 September, 2005, Alexandru Popescu wrote:

Thanks for quick answer, but..

> According to www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/annotations-itds.html an annotation type 
> cannot be the target of an inter-type declaration. What you need is to push your ITD on an type 
> annotated with @Persistable.

I've seen this doc, and wondering why that's the case. Basically
it is possible having some inter-types using marker interfaces.

> So you probably need a marker interface and than do the ITD:
> interface PersistenceAware {};
> declare parents @Persistable * implements java.io.Serializable;
> declare parents @Persistable * implements PersistenceAware;
> 
> static final PersistenceAware.serialVersionUID = 17L;

1) Both "static" and "final" fields doesn't work with _interface_ 
(compiler error)

2) The problem with above (when applying inter-type field to an
_interface_) is that as a result I have other field than
'serialVersionUID':

@Persistable Pojo.class:
public class Pojo implements java.io.Serializable, PersistenceAware
{
    //...
    public long ajc$interField$MyAspect$PersistenceAware$serialVersionUID;
    //..and I need simple public final _static_ serialVersionUID...
}

3) When applying to a concrete _class_ with:
@Persistable Pojo.class:
public class Pojo implements java.io.Serializable
{
    //...
    static final PojoConcrete.serialVersionUID = 17L;
    //it works, but I don't want the pointcut based on a concrete
    //class
}

Tomasz



-- 
  _i______'simplicity_is_the_key'__________tomasz_nazar
  _ii____'i_am_concern_oriented'________________PJKM.pl
  _iii__'patsystem.sf.net'___________________linux_user
  _Heaven_&_Fellows,_PPP______________________prevayler