[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-users] AOP tools
|
Bo,
You can also use "-XshowWeaveInfo" which can be set in the project
properties.
Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/
Bo Yi <boyi@xxxxxxxxxx>@eclipse.org on 16/09/2005 15:48:51
Please respond to aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx, aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [aspectj-users] AOP tools
Yes, I can get join points in AJDT visually.
But it is very handy to print a list of join points in console or a text
file when one have to find problems with aspects.
Regards,
Bo
----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Bo Yi
WebSphere Development & Testing
IBM Toronto Lab
A2-713/Q2Z/8200/MKM
8200 Warden Ave. Markham ONT. L6G 1C7
Phone: 905-413-4819
Tie Line: 969-4819
E-Mail: boyi@xxxxxxxxxx
"Ron DiFrango"
<rdifrango@captechventures
.com> To
Sent by: <aspectj-users@ec
aspectj-users-bounces@ecli lipse.org>
pse.org cc
09/16/2005 10:11 AM Subject
RE:
Please respond to [aspectj-users]
aspectj-users AOP tools
All,
Don't you in effect get this from AJDT? Unless your project weaves into
external JAR's, you get immediate feedback from AJDT of what Join points
are affecting which classes.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Bo Yi [mailto:boyi@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 9:57 AM
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx;
aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [aspectj-users] AOP tools
Hi All,
I like the idea to have a tool probe join points take place
in java packages. It can be a new tool or an option in ajc -- aspectj
compiler. Does the compiler has such option already, I did not pay
attention on its new move recently.
Thanks All,
Bo
----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Bo Yi
WebSphere Development & Testing
IBM Toronto Lab
A2-713/Q2Z/8200/MKM
8200 Warden Ave. Markham ONT. L6G 1C7
Phone: 905-413-4819
Tie Line: 969-4819
E-Mail: boyi@xxxxxxxxxx
"Antti Karanta" <antti.karanta@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
09/16/2005 01:23 AM
Please respond to
aspectj-users
To
<aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [aspectj-users] AOP tools
> #: mohan.radhakrishnan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed the world a
bit
> at a time by saying on 9/15/2005 3:37
> PM :#
> > Hi,
> > Actually I was trying to see if we could prototype
> AspectJ using a
> > tool like the one Groovy is using.
> >
> > 1. Write some pointcuts in a console. The full code for
an
> aspect and
> > other confugurations are not needed.
> > 2. Apply them and see the result.
>
> I am worried about this step, as for applying them you
> already should have written your classes.
> Probably the mechanims would be to have external
> sources/bytecode for your classes, imported them in
> groovy and than weaved. It may become interesting.
If I'm understanding Mohan correctly, I think he just
means a sort of
interactive pointcut matcher, so you could type in a
pointcut and you'd
see what matches you get on your inpath, something like
this:
C:\>ajsh -inpath myjar1.jar;adir\others.jar
ajsh> call(fi.mypackage.*.*(..)) &&
!within(fi.mypackage.*);
fi.otherpackage.SomeClass:57 : method-call(double
fi.mypackage.AClass.doSomething(int) : double d =
anObjectFromThatPackage.doSomething(1);
fi.otherpackage.SomeClass:112 : method-call(void
fi.mypackage.XClass.save(int) : x.save();
...
No weaving is necessary.
That would be quite a handy tool. = )
BTW, would something similar be usable in AJDT, i.e. you
could click
on a pointcut and see a sort of "wincvs annotation" style
list of
matches, like above (with the actual code that matches
shown)? The texts
would naturally act as hyperlinks to the actual code, and
different
matches could have different background color to make it
easy to tell
them apart. The columns could be turned on/off, e.g. if you
do not wish
to see what joinpoint matched but just the source code or
vice versa. I
think this would complement the present Cross References
view nicely (or
maybe this functionality could be added to that view?).
Sounds cool to me, what do you others think?
.::Antti::.
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
