[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [aspectj-users] AJDT and Aspectj
|
Vincent,
Thanks for that tip. In my case, eclipse [actually MyEclipse] is required any way, so I wanted a way to build with the built-in aspectj within AJDT. Also, as I added in my last email, I want to just build within Eclipse fully.
Before, I did just what you were talking about though. Which made the process a pain, build on command line with ANT/aspectj, then refresh Eclipse to pickup the changes, then re-build within eclipse. The reason for the step is that I am using hibernate's hbm2java [XML to java] generation. I could have setup a build within Eclipse, but never got that far.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent Jorrand [mailto:vjorrand@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thu 9/15/2005 10:13 AM
To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: RE: [aspectj-users] AJDT and Aspectj
Ron,
We use a full install of AspectJ in our ant scripts as
it allows us to run them unchanged on a machine that
does not have an eclipse install.
In particular we use anthill to get continuous
integration and testing, and the anthill server does
not have eclipse. We keep aspectjtools.jar in our CVS
repository, so anthill retrieves it along with the
source code. It also guarantees that anyone running an
ant build uses the same version of aspectj.
Vincent
--- Ron DiFrango <rdifrango@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Andy,
>
> One question though, does this work when you run ANT
> through Eclipse? Do you have to setup a different
> project.
>
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Clement
> [mailto:andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thu 9/15/2005 4:00 AM
> To: difranr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT and Aspectj
>
>
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> Yes, you get the iajc task but there is a little
> extra config to
> perform in your build.xml if you want to use that
> version rather than
> using aspectjtools.jar from a fully installed
> AspectJ build. It is
> described in the AJDT faq:
>
> http://eclipse.org/ajdt/faq.html#q:ant
>
> However, I notice that gives an example for 3.0
> eclipse - it is
> probably a bit different for 3.1 ...
>
> AJDT is now getting new versions of AspectJ every
> monday - so at the
> moment AJDT includes the dev build from the morning
> of Monday 12th
> September.
>
> Andy.
>
>
> On 15/09/05, Ronald R. DiFrango
> <difranr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > With AJDT, does the aspecjt ANT get installed any
> where and if so
> > where? Also with the latest version of AJDT,
> what is the version of
> > aspectj?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Ron
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users