[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] Package Annotations
|
Thank you for the quick response. I guess I had missed
that section.
Vincent
--- Adrian Colyer <adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the section headed "Package and Parameter
> Annotations" :
>
>
http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/annotations-pointcuts-and-advice.html#d0e1421
>
> the notebook also says:
>
> "Note: A previous design allowed package annotation
> patterns to be
> specified directly in type patterns, and parameter
> annotation patterns
> to be specified directly in method and constructor
> signature patterns.
> Because this made some pointcut expressions hard to
> read and
> understand, we moved in favour of the design
> presented below (should
> say above), which also has its drawbacks (namely,
> you can't match on
> package and parameter annotations). Matching on
> package and parameter
> annotations will be deferred until after the 1.5.0
> release so that we
> can gain more understanding of the kinds of uses
> AspectJ users are
> making of annotations in pointcut expressions before
> commiting to any
> one approach."
>
> (I added the stuff in parentheses).
>
> -- Adrian.
>
> On 26/08/05, Vincent Jorrand <vjorrand@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > The AspectJ 5 Developer's Notebook says:
> >
> >
> >
> > > For any kind of annotated element
> (type,
> > method, constructor, package, etc.), an annotation
> > pattern can be used to match against the set of
> > annotations on the annotated element.
> >
> >
> >
> > But I cannot find any way to use package
> annotations
> > in aspects.
> >
> > What I would like to do is add an annotation to
> some
> > packages and then write a pointcut that matches
> all
> > methods in classes in packages that declare the
> > annotations.
> >
> > It would probably look something like:
> >
> >
> >
> > public aspect MyAspect {
> >
> > pointcut pc(): execution(* (@MyAnnotation
> > *).*.*());
> >
> >
> >
> > before(): pc() {
> >
> > System.out.println("here");
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > But the above is not allowed by the syntax for
> > TypePattern.
> >
> > The TypePattern syntax only allows annotations at
> the
> > outermost level as far as I can tell.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
>
>
> --
> -- Adrian
> adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>